Subscribe   RSS Contact Us

Kamp Commentary: Pricing Issues Take Center Stage in D.C.

May 23, 2017 — By Coalition for Healthcare Communication Executive Director John Kamp Participants at last week’s Coalition for Healthcare ... read more

Califf Calls for Off-label Promotion Code of Ethics

May 18, 2017 – At this week’s information-packed Coalition for Healthcare Communication’s Rising Leaders Conference, keynote speaker and former FDA ... read more

The Marketing Implications of Tax Reform

By John Kamp, Coalition for Healthcare Communication Executive Director May 11, 2017 – Although no one seems to like the ... read more

Gottlieb Vote Headed to Full Senate

May 1, 2017 – Having cleared the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) with a 14-9 vote ... read more

What Medical Marketers Can Expect from President Trump, Republican-led Congress

April 24, 2017 – There is no doubt that the Trump administration is likely to change health policy, but the ... read more

Kamp: Three Ways Congress Could Suppress DTC or All Medical Marketing

Coalition Commentary by Executive Director John Kamp April 17, 2017 — Agencies, media and clients all need to watch closely ... read more

States Make Moves to Ease, Restrict Medical Communications

March 31, 2017 – With Congress in a seemingly permanent state of gridlock, individual states are taking actions that may ... read more

Previous Next

FDA Willing to “Re-examine” Off-label Policies in Light of First Amendment Rulings

April 28, 2014 – The FDA is not taking lightly industry’s concerns that its existing off-label policies are not in line with the most recent First Amendment case law, according to FDA senior officials who spoke recently at the Food and Drug Law Institute’s Annual Meeting held in Washington, D.C.

On April 23, Leslie Kux, FDA’s assistant commissioner for policy and director of the Office of the Commissioner’s Office of Policy, cited some of the off-label promotion policies that the FDA is reconsidering in response to industry’s concerns. These include policies pertaining to unsolicited requests for information, scientific exchange, communication with formulary committees and payers, healthcare economic information and third-party clinical practice guidelines.

“Clearly FDA has officially moved from the denial phase into a more realistic and productive mode in response to the reality that the First Amendment applies to its rules and policies,” said Coalition for Healthcare Communication Executive Director John Kamp. “The CHC and others are anxious to dialogue with the agency on how best to reform the rules for the benefit of patients,” he said.

Kux indicated that the agency has “taken a number of steps to start down this road,” such as opening a docket on scientific exchange (and developing draft guidance document on the matter “relatively soon”), working on the final unsolicited requests draft guidance and drafting a guidance on healthcare economic information.

“We are looking more broadly, so I do want to assure everybody that we are taking the First Amendment concerns that we’ve heard very seriously,” Kux told the FDLI meeting attendees. She noted that the agency is accepting comments on the draft reprint guidance until May 2. “We’d be very glad to have everyone’s comments on that, too,” she said.

The agency’s collective actions in light of First Amendment issues raised by industry in comments and in a citizen petition filed by the Medical Information Working Group in September 2013 – which requested that the agency review the recent developments in First and Fifth Amendment case law, as well as ongoing changes in the delivery of medical services (see http://www.cohealthcom.org/?p=1813) – indicate that the agency is not turning a blind eye to First Amendment concerns.

Indeed, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Director Janet Woodcock said at the FDLI meeting that the agency is aware of recent court decisions in U.S. v. Caronia and IMS v. Sorrell, and of their influence on FDA positions and policies.