Subscribe   RSS Contact Us

Holcombe’s E&C Testimony: PDUFA VI Will Take Patient-focused Drug Development to New Level

March 23, 2017 – In testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Health yesterday, Biotechnology Industry Organization ... read more

Gottlieb Is “Known” Entity to Pharma Industry

March 20, 2017 – Although medical marketers are very familiar with Scott Gottlieb, President Donald Trump’s choice for the top ... read more

Industry Groups Oppose Oregon Bill Calling for Advertising Price Disclosure

March 9, 2017 – Four major advertising and media industry groups have issued a joint letter opposing an Oregon bill ... read more

Trump Needs to Take a Closer Look at FDA Performance

March 8, 2017 – In an open letter to President Donald Trump, Pharmalot’s Ed Silverman asks that before Trump criticizes ... read more

Industry Peacekeeping with President Trump Holds Promise But Portends Danger

By John Kamp, Executive Director, Coalition for Healthcare Communication [Editor’s Note: This “The Final Word” column appeared in the February ... read more

Citizen Petition Calls on FDA to Stay Final Rule Establishing “Totality of the Evidence” Standard for Intended Use

Feb. 24, 2017 – The FDA recently published a final rule on intended use and adequate directions for use that ... read more

Previous Next

FDA Willing to “Re-examine” Off-label Policies in Light of First Amendment Rulings

April 28, 2014 – The FDA is not taking lightly industry’s concerns that its existing off-label policies are not in line with the most recent First Amendment case law, according to FDA senior officials who spoke recently at the Food and Drug Law Institute’s Annual Meeting held in Washington, D.C.

On April 23, Leslie Kux, FDA’s assistant commissioner for policy and director of the Office of the Commissioner’s Office of Policy, cited some of the off-label promotion policies that the FDA is reconsidering in response to industry’s concerns. These include policies pertaining to unsolicited requests for information, scientific exchange, communication with formulary committees and payers, healthcare economic information and third-party clinical practice guidelines.

“Clearly FDA has officially moved from the denial phase into a more realistic and productive mode in response to the reality that the First Amendment applies to its rules and policies,” said Coalition for Healthcare Communication Executive Director John Kamp. “The CHC and others are anxious to dialogue with the agency on how best to reform the rules for the benefit of patients,” he said.

Kux indicated that the agency has “taken a number of steps to start down this road,” such as opening a docket on scientific exchange (and developing draft guidance document on the matter “relatively soon”), working on the final unsolicited requests draft guidance and drafting a guidance on healthcare economic information.

“We are looking more broadly, so I do want to assure everybody that we are taking the First Amendment concerns that we’ve heard very seriously,” Kux told the FDLI meeting attendees. She noted that the agency is accepting comments on the draft reprint guidance until May 2. “We’d be very glad to have everyone’s comments on that, too,” she said.

The agency’s collective actions in light of First Amendment issues raised by industry in comments and in a citizen petition filed by the Medical Information Working Group in September 2013 – which requested that the agency review the recent developments in First and Fifth Amendment case law, as well as ongoing changes in the delivery of medical services (see http://www.cohealthcom.org/?p=1813) – indicate that the agency is not turning a blind eye to First Amendment concerns.

Indeed, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Director Janet Woodcock said at the FDLI meeting that the agency is aware of recent court decisions in U.S. v. Caronia and IMS v. Sorrell, and of their influence on FDA positions and policies.