Subscribe   RSS Contact Us

DTC Study Does Not Claim DTC Ads Cause Doctors to Prescribe Inappropriately

May 23, 2013 – A study of the effect of direct-to-consumer advertising for statin drugs on physician prescribing that recently was ... read more

The Atlantic: Finding the Right Industry-Physician Relationship Advances Medicine

May 20, 2013 – Although relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and physicians have come under greater scrutiny as the implementation ... read more

WLF to CMS: Deem Medical Textbooks Educational Materials or Face Potential First Amendment Challenge

May 16, 2013 – The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is likely “to find itself the target of ... read more

Kamp in MMM: Off-label Is on the Table

May 14, 2013 — In a Medical Marketing and Media (MMM) column posted May 1, Coalition for Healthcare Communication Executive ... read more

Many Physicians Are Both Unaware and Wary of Sunshine Act Requirements, Survey Says

May 6, 2013 — With Sunshine Act reporting slated to begin in less than three months, it is sobering to ... read more

Senate Commerce Committee Growing Impatient with Self-regulatory Measures

April 29, 2013 – Although the Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA) has made great strides to protect consumers’ privacy online – ... read more

Coalition: Educational Materials Should Be Excluded from Sunshine Reporting

April 22, 2013 – In April 18 comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) the Coalition for ... read more

White Paper Examines FDA Enforcement in Digital, Social Media Realm

April 4, 2013 – A new White Paper, “FDA Communications Oversight in a Digital Era,” issued April 2 by Eye ... read more

Policy and Medicine: News Outlets Accentuate the Negative in Describing Industry-Physician Relationships

April 4, 2013 — Headlines run by news outlets regarding the status of industry-physician relationships rarely focus on the benefits ... read more

Kamp Commentary: Supreme Court Decision Could End “Pay for Delay,” Hurt Patent Protection

April 1, 2013 – By John Kamp, Executive Director, Coalition for Healthcare Communication While not directly about communication and marketing, ... read more

Promotion Down, But Prospects Up for New Drugs

March 22, 2013 – Although spending on drug promotion has declined in recent years,  2013 could be a pivotal year ... read more

“Cyberspace Is Not Without Boundaries,” FTC States in Digital Advertising Guidelines

March 19, 2013 – Although the FDA has not yet issued its long-awaited social media guidance for the biopharma industry, ... read more

NDHI Releases Statement Outlining Four Principles for Industry/Provider Collaborations

March 11, 2013 – Healthcare industry collaborations with physicians and researchers have “been at the heart of most of the ... read more

Study Cites Benefits of Pharma’s Promotional Efforts

March 4, 2013 – A recent study released by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) states that although consumer-directed ... read more

CMS Launches "OpenPayments" Site as Part of Sunshine Implementation

Feb. 25, 2013 – The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) launched its “OPENPAYMENTS” Website last week, which will be ... read more

Sunshine Act Final Rule: Coalition for Healthcare Communication Summary

On Feb. 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule implementing the Sunshine Act provisions ... read more

Sunshine Act Final Rule Resets Clock on Annual Reporting of Payments to Physicians

Many Questions Still Unresolved Feb. 4, 2013 – Although the final rule to implement the Sunshine provisions of the Affordable ... read more

Coalition’s Policy Update: Keep Fiscal Challenges, Privacy Regulation on Radar

Jan. 15, 2013 – If 2012 – with its high number of new drug approvals, senior staff stability within the ... read more

OPDP Untitled Letters on PR Materials Surprise Industry

Nov. 27, 2012 – An Oct. 31 enforcement letter from the FDA’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) to Cornerstone ... read more

DAA’s Self-regulatory Ad Program to Protect Consumers Online Is Praised by White House, DOC and FTC

 Feb. 23, 2012 – At a White House meeting held today to unveil the blueprint for the Obama Administration’s “Consumer ... read more

Sorrell v. IMS: What Marketing Professionals Need to Know

By John Kamp, Executive Director, Coalition for Healthcare Communication July 18, 2011 — For those who have not read the ... read more

Previous Next

DDMAC Calls Out Recent Marketing Violations in Enforcement Webinar

Sept. 6, 2011 – The FDA’s Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications (DDMAC) issued three Warning Letters and nine Untitled Letters in the past four months, according to DDMAC officials speaking at an Enforcement Webinar held Aug. 25. The Webinar was part of a DDMAC pilot program to allow stakeholders to better understand and learn from the enforcement actions the agency issues in a recent quarter.

The promotional materials that were the subject of these enforcement actions included one magnet, one detail aid, one booklet, one flyer, two flashcards, and six Web sites (one of which was a YouTube video). Three of these alleged violations came to DDMAC’s attention through complaints under its “Bad Ad” program.

“These DDMAC programs give drug sponsors and their marketing partners clear guidance on the enforcement priorities of the FDA,” said John Kamp, executive director of the Coalition for Healthcare Communication. “DDMAC is responding to complaints elicited through the Bad Ad program. Marketers must pay attention to Internet promotions and detail aids that could violate FDA policies.”

The DDMAC Webinar detailed several specific violations that drew Untitled and Warning Letters in the last few months:

  • Omission/minimization of risk
  • Unsubstantiated claims (e.g., unsubstantiated superiority claims)
  • Broadening of indication
  • Overstatement of efficacy
  • Omission of material facts
  • Promotion of an investigational drug
  • Misleading claims (i.e., those related to dosing, compliance)
  • Failure to submit under Form 2253

In a Warning Letter issued for promotion of an investigational drug on the company’s Web site, DDMAC explains that it finds the promotion “concerning from a public health perspective” because it suggests that the drug “is safe and effective when the product has not been approved by the FDA and the promotional claims made have not been demonstrated by substantial evidence or substantial clinical experience.”

DDMAC has said it is holding these “focused Webinars” to “support DDMAC’s mission to protect the public health by assuring prescription drug information is truthful, balanced, and accurately communicated.”

On Sept. 26 and 27, Tom Abrams, head of DDMAC, and representatives of the other marketing enforcement centers at the FDA will be making additional enforcement presentations at the FDLI marketing meeting in Washington, D.C. (link to the FDLI Marketing Conference Agenda). On Tuesday, Sept. 27, Kamp will be moderating a luncheon panel with industry legal experts addressing these issues and the legal ramifications of the IMS Supreme Court decision issued in June.